News 2017-10-27T19:08:20+00:00

Berney on KYW News for Landmark Bullying Case

December 12th, 2018|0 Comments

On November 13, 2018, David Berney, Esq. argued before a panel of judges of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court in Nicole B. v. School District of Philadelphia. In that case, the student was the victim of brutal bullying and harassment. However, the lower court threw the case out because it did not believe that the minority tolling statute applied to the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, Pennsylvania’s anti-discrimination law and the law under which the parent brought claims on behalf of the student. This case will potentially have long-lasting implications for students’ right to bring forth lawsuits for the unlawful bullying and harassment that they have suffered at school.

Listen to KYW News’s report here:

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

December 12th, 2018|0 Comments

There’s nothing more motivating for our work than seeing a student who has found the joy in learning. She just needed the right school.

Golembiewski Co-Counsels COPAA Amicus Brief in Ninth Circuit

December 2nd, 2018|0 Comments

Associate Kevin Golembiewski recently co-counseled an amicus brief in the United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on behalf of the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA), a national nonprofit dedicated to parents and children with disabilities.  The brief, filed in support of the parent in Jay F. v. William S. Hart Union High School District, argued that manifestation determinations are critical to protecting the rights of children with emotional disturbance.

The California Association for Parent-Child Advocacy (CAPCA) also signed on to the amicus brief.

Philadelphia Gay News Spotlights Landmark Berney & Sang Bullying Case

November 9th, 2018|0 Comments

The Philadelphia Gay News recently published a story on Wible v. School District of Philadelphia, the landmark bullying case that Berney & Sang litigated this year.  You can access the article, Phila. school district appeals $500,000 award for bullying victim, here.

Philadelphia Inquirer Publishes Story on Berney & Sang’s Landmark Bullying Case

October 27th, 2018|0 Comments

The Philadelphia Inquirer published a story today on Wible v. School District of Philadelphia, the landmark bullying case that Berney & Sang litigated this year.  You can access the article, Bullied in school, a Northeast Philly woman won a $500,000 judgment. Her case could ripple, here.

Berney Presents on Special Ed Law at the Jenkins Law Library

October 25th, 2018|0 Comments

On October 24, 2018, partner David J. Berney presented on special education law at the Jenkins Law Library in Philadelphia.  His presentation focused on his path to becoming a special education lawyer and why others should consider a career in special education law.

The presentation was inspired by associate Kevin Golembiewski’s recent article, Recent Law School Grads: I’m a Special Education Attorney, Please Join Me, which appeared in the Legal Intelligencer.

Berney and Sang to Present at 2018 Exceptional Children’s Conference

October 1st, 2018|0 Comments

Each year, the Pennsylvania Bar Institute hosts the Exceptional Children’s Conference, Pennsylvania’s premier conference on special education law.  At the Conference, select attorneys and hearing officers present on issues related to special education law.  Partners David J. Berney and Jennifer Y. Sang were selected to present at this year’s Conference.  They, with school district attorney Sarah B. Dragotta, will present on federal and state laws that protect children with disabilities from bullying and harassment:

The Conference is Monday, October 8, 2018 in Lancaster, PA at the Marriott.  The brochure is here.

Golembiewski Co-Counsels U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief

September 12th, 2018|0 Comments

This term, the United States Supreme Court will decide whether the Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause applies to the states.  The case is Timbs. v. Indiana.  Associate Kevin Golembiewski co-counseled an amicus brief in support of the petitioner, Mr. Timbs, who seeks protection of the Clause.  Mr. Golembiewski co-counseled in his capacity as amicus chair of the Federal Bar Association’s Civil Rights Section.  Several other organizations also counseled the brief, including the DKT Liberty Project, the Due Process Institute, the Goldwater Institute, the Cato Institute, and the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

Here’s a brief overview of the case.  Mr. Timbs was convicted for non-violent offenses in Indiana state court.  The District Attorney sought to take his car by civil forfeiture, but the trial court held that the Excessive Fines Clause prohibits the forfeiture.  According to the court, the maximum fine for Timbs’s offenses was $10,000 and the car was worth four times that, so forfeiting it was excessive.

The state court of appeals affirmed, but the state Supreme Court reversed, finding that the Excessive Fines Clause does not apply to the states through the 14th Amendment.  In doing so, the Court recognized that the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has concluded the opposite.
Mr. Timbs then asked the United States Supreme Court to review the decision.  The Court agreed to.  It will hear the case in the coming months.

The Tyler Clementi Foundation Names Berney, Sang, and Golembiewski 2018 Upstander Award Winners

August 14th, 2018|0 Comments

The Tyler Clementi Foundation has named David J. Berney, Jennifer Y. Sang, and Kevin Golembiewski 2018 Upstander Award winners.  The Award honors individuals who advance the Foundation’s mission of ending bullying in schools, workplaces, and faith communities.  The Foundation selected Berney, Sang, and Golembiewski based on their advocacy in Wible v. School District of Philadelphia, Berney & Sang’s landmark case holding that the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act protects children from student-on-student harassment and bullying.

  • Kevin Golembiewski headshot

Golembiewski to Recent Law School Grads: Become a Special Education Attorney

June 23rd, 2018|1 Comment

This week, associate Kevin Golembiewski published an article in the Legal Intelligencer, Pennsylvania’s premier legal newspaper, encouraging recent law school graduates to become special education attorneys.  Here are the first few paragraphs of the article:

You may not know what special education law is, much less what it means to be a special education attorney, but I hope you’ll consider becoming one.  Special education attorneys are responsible for enforcing the rights of children with disabilities.  But there aren’t enough of us. Around the nation, there are millions of children with disabilities and only a few thousand of us.  In Pennsylvania, there are 250,000 children with disabilities but just 100 or so attorneys who serve them. Kids and their families need you. Join us for them.

Join us for you, too.  Special education law is rewarding, and it offers young attorneys unique professional opportunities. I know from my own experience.

You can access the full article here.


Philadelphia Magazine Profiles Berney & Sang Win in Bullying Case

June 6th, 2018|0 Comments

You can read the article here.

Sang Wins Due Process Hearing, Secures Tuition Reimbursement

May 30th, 2018|0 Comments

This week, a Pennsylvania Special Education Hearing Officer awarded tuition reimbursement to one of partner Jennifer Sang’s clients.  Sang represented the client in a multi-day due process hearing against the Perkiomen Valley School District.  Based on the evidence offered by Sang, the Hearing Officer determined that Perkiomen failed to offer the client’s child a free and appropriate public education (FAPE), and he ordered Perkiomen to reimburse the client for a full year of private school tuition.

Berney & Sang Files Third Circuit Amicus Brief on behalf of COPAA

February 28th, 2018|0 Comments

David J. Berney and Kevin Golembiewski filed an amicus brief today in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA), the Education Law Center, New Jersey Special Education Practitioners, and the National Center for Learning Disabilities.  The brief supports the appellants in K.D. et al. v. Downingtown Area School District, No. 17-3065 (3d Cir.).

K.D. is a child with specific learning disabilities.  Her parents sued Downingtown Area School District under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), arguing that Downingtown denied her a chance to make appropriate educational progress.  The District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled against the parents.  It found that, although K.D. made minimal educational progress, such progress was appropriate for her.  Driving this finding was the court’s presumption that children with learning disabilities like K.D. cannot reasonably be expected to make grade-level progress.

COPAA and the other amici intervened in K.D. because they are concerned about this presumption.  The presumption is factually flawed, and it contravenes the IDEA.  The amicus brief explains:

[C]hildren with learning disabilities are a diverse group, and with appropriate, individualized interventions, many are capable of advancing grade to grade with their nondisabled peers.  Children with learning disabilities have deficits in a specific learning skill, so some struggle in reading, some in math, and some in other areas.  And a child’s learning disability is just one part of her educational profile.  Beyond learning disabilities, other factors influence a child’s potential, including social intelligence, creativity, emotional regulation, and work ethic.  Each child with a learning disability possesses a unique blend of these attributes.  Many children with learning disabilities have average to above-average intelligence and potential for grade-level growth.

The brief then goes on to point out that:

[The] IDEA, designed to protect children from misconceptions and low expectations forbids [the district court’s] presumption.  It demands that schools expect grade-level advancement from children with learning disabilities, including those with severe learning disabilities in comprehension, reading, and writing.

You can access the full amicus brief here.

The Notebook: Berney & Sang Appeal Addresses Critical School Bullying & Harassment Issues

February 22nd, 2018|0 Comments

The Notebook, Philadelphia’s leading newspaper on public education, published an article today covering Berney & Sang’s appeal in Nicole B. v. School District of Philadelphia.  The appeal argues that the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act protect students from discriminatory bullying and harassment.  It is a landmark appeal, with the potential to secure important protections for children who suffer bullying and harassment.  Several prominent civil rights organizations are supporting the appeal, including the Education Law Center, the Public Interest Law Center, Pennsylvania Disability Rights, the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape, and the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates.

The Notebook’s article highlights the importance of the appeal, stating:

[N]o appellate court in Pennsylvania has yet considered how the act applies to school districts when it comes to bullying.  That leaves students and families the option of going to federal court, which can be more costly and difficult.  If the appeal . . . is granted, the decision may set a precedent that makes it easier for families seeking recompense for discriminatory abuse in school.

You can access the full article here.


Sang to Serve as Panelist at Philly Linguistic and Multicultural Disability Summit

February 18th, 2018|0 Comments

Partner Jennifer Sang has been selected to serve as a panelist at the First Annual Greater Philadelphia Linguistic and Multicultural Disability Summit.  According to Councilwoman Jannie L. Blackwell, one of the Summit’s organizers, the Summit aims to “bring together culturally and linguistically diverse disability communities for a day of dialogue, cultural appreciation, and action planning to address the needs of the disability community.”  The Honorable Tony Coehlo, who helped write the American Disabilities Act, will offer remarks.

Jennifer will serve on a panel titled, “Reimagining Special Education in the 21st Century.”  Her co-panelists will include Councilwoman Jannie L. Blackwell, Councilwoman Helen Gym, Otis Hackney from the Mayor’s Office on Education, and William Hite, the Superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia.  Jennifer is honored to present with such an accomplished panel, and she is excited to leverage her experiences as a special education lawyer to address the needs of diverse disability communities.  Jennifer has represented hundreds of Philadelphia families in special education cases; she is eager to use what she’s learned in those cases to make a systemic impact.

The Summit is scheduled for March 17, 2018 from 9AM to 2PM.

  • Kevin Golembiewski headshot

Golembiewski Co-Counsels 11th Circuit Special Education Appeal

February 16th, 2018|0 Comments

Associate Kevin Golembiewski is representing a child with autism in a special education appeal before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.  He is co-counseling the appeal with Southern Legal Counsel, a public interest law firm based in Florida, and Alice Nelson, Esquire.

The appeal presents multiple issues of first impression, including the proper standard for IEP-implementation claims.

The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA) has filed an amicus brief in support of the appeal.

  • Symbol of law and justice in the empty courtroom law and justice concept blue toned.

Press Release: Berney & Sang Appeal Ruling Denying PA Children Protection from Discriminatory Bullying and Harassment

January 29th, 2018|0 Comments

Release: Appeal challenges Philadelphia court’s ruling that Pennsylvania school districts have no obligation to protect children from discriminatory bullying and harassment.

January 29, 2018

Contact: Kevin Golembiewski; Berney & Sang; 215.690.1722; kag@berneylaw.com; @k_golembiewski (Twitter).

Philadelphia, PA: An appeal filed last week against the School District of Philadelphia seeks to overturn a Court of Common Pleas decision finding that Pennsylvania school districts have no obligation to protect children from discriminatory bullying and harassment. The appeal argues that the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA)—Pennsylvania’s flagship antidiscrimination statute—requires school districts to take corrective measures when they know a child is being bullied or harassed based on a protected characteristic such as race, sex, religion, or disability.

The appeal arises from a fourth grader’s horrifying experiences at the William C. Bryant School in West Philadelphia: the boy was bullied, harassed, and ultimately raped at Bryant.

Several prominent civil rights organizations have filed amicus briefs in support of the appeal, including the Education Law Center, the Public Interest Law Center, the Juvenile Law Center, the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Disability Rights Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape.

The appeal has broad implications for Pennsylvania students. A decision affirming the Court of Common Pleas would leave students with no protections against discriminatory bullying and harassment under Pennsylvania law. This would make Pennsylvania an anomaly—other states require school districts to protect students.

In 2011, the boy at the center of the appeal transferred to Bryant, and three classmates immediately targeted him, harassing him because he did not conform to norms about masculinity. The harassment was also racially charged. Every day the classmates called him names like “fa****,” “gay,” “homo,” “b****,” “pu***,” “d*** eater,” “black n****r,” and “black a**.” They beat him, kicked him, and shoved him. They broke his glasses, dumped his books out of his backpack, cornered him in bathrooms, and threatened to kill him. They bullied him into unwanted sexual acts, forcing him to watch a video of two men having sex and to simulate sex with a flagpole while a group of students watched and laughed. They also dared him to run into the girls’ bathroom and sexually assault his classmates.

School officials knew about this physical and verbal harassment, but they failed to take corrective measures. So the harassment continued for weeks, culminating in the three classmates raping the boy in a school bathroom while they screamed, “give it to the fag.”

After the rape, Berney & Sang, a civil rights law firm, filed this lawsuit alleging that the School District of Philadelphia violated the PHRA by ignoring the bullying and harassment.

Berney & Sang receives countless calls each year from parents who are desperate to protect their children from bullying and harassment. For all too many children in Pennsylvania, discussions of bullying and harassment trigger the well-known response: “Me Too.”

“Unfortunately, the Education Law Center hears frequently from families about issues of bullying and harassment in schools,” said Lizzy Wingfield, Stoneleigh Foundation Emerging Leader Fellow at the Education Law Center. “The issue of unaddressed bullying is pervasive and is particularly common when the bullied student is a child of color who does not conform to societal gender norms or is LGBTQ. Too many people who should intervene to stop bullying view the harassment of gender nonconforming or LGBTQ students of color as if it is normal, so they don’t take it as seriously as the bullying of white, gender-conforming students. That’s why it is so critical that the PHRA is available as a tool to root out discriminatory pervasive bullying.”

Catherine Reisman, counsel for the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, added: “There is clear evidence from social scientists that students who are bullied at school—particularly students with disabilities—are effectively robbed of the benefits of a public education.” “In addition, bullying negatively impacts these students’ physical and mental well-being. The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates and Disability Rights Pennsylvania filed their amicus brief to ensure that the appellate court is aware of these devastating consequences.”

“School bullying damages our children in ways that can’t easily be undone. As a result, bullying is not only an education issue, it is also a public health issue,” David J. Berney, the lead attorney on the appeal, said. “In enacting the PHRA, the state legislature intended to protect children from discriminatory bullying—our appeal gives Pennsylvania’s appellate courts a chance to reaffirm that.”

Berney also criticized the School District of Philadelphia for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars hiring outside law firms to dispute the case rather than devoting those resources to combating harassment in schools.

The School District of Philadelphia will file its response to the appeal in the coming weeks. There is no timeline yet for a decision.

Berney named 2018 Super Lawyer

January 16th, 2018|0 Comments

Partner David J. Berney has once again been named a Super Lawyer.  This is his tenth straight year being selected.  Only lawyers “who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement” are selected as Super Lawyers.  Congratulations David!

  • Kevin Golembiewski headshot

Golembiewski Publishes Article Explaining Why Complacency is a Foe of Justice

December 22nd, 2017|0 Comments

Yesterday, associate Kevin Golembiewski published an article in the Legal Intelligencer discussing how complacency contributes to injustice.  The article focuses on complacency within schools, using a recent Education Law Center complaint against the School District of Philadelphia to illustrate the consequences of complacency in the face of wrongdoing.

You can access the article, “Education Law Center Complaint Illustrates Why Complacency is a Foe of Justice,” here.

Black-Smith Prevails in Back-to-Back Due Process Hearings

December 18th, 2017|0 Comments

Associate Morgen Black-Smith recently secured victories for two families in special education due process hearings.  In both cases, Black-Smith represented parents of children with disabilities who used to attend Khepera Charter School.  Alleging that Khepera denied their children a free and appropriate public education (FAPE), the parents requested compensatory education services.  The Hearing Officer agreed with the parents that Khepera denied their children FAPE and awarded around $14,000 in compensatory education services to each family.  Further, after concluding that the children’s placement at a private school is their “stay-put” placement, the Hearing Officer ordered Khepera to pay the children’s tuition at the school.  The first decision is J.D. v. Khepera Charter School, and the second is J.R. v. Khepera Charter School.


We are special education attorneys. We are advocates for workers. We are attorneys who will fight for you.

Request a Consultation